I posted to Toni Duke h
ttp://MomTech-eBlogger.blogspot.com
and Rachel Bell
http://rachelbell33.blogspot.com
I do believe that humans have the basic
instinct to collaborate as indicated by Rheingold in his discussion of the
evolution of Wikipedia and the building of the pyramids. Differences
in groups’ cultural makeup can improve the level of knowledge and understanding
in the collaborative efforts. The availability of collaborative technology
(Google Docs, Elluminate, Skype, Web conferencing, etc.) allows for group
discussions regardless of members locations. There can be some dissension among
collaborative group from time to time as pointed out by Rheingold. But unless someone is looking to gain all the
credit, by discounting other members’ contribution, then the group can, and
will work cohesively together.
My experiences with collaboration has been primarily in corporate and it is oftentimes a key driver in companies
performance and return on investment. During my career with a cutting edge technology
driven company, as a Product Manager, I conducted weekly collaborative team
meetings to assess newly deployed product dynamics, product performances,
market strategies, customer satisfaction and sales growth. During discussion, we expressed varying opinions;
however, we found common area of agreements that helped move our collaboration
forward.
·
How can technology facilitate
collaboration among learners based on constructivist principles?
Several
team members resided in 5 difference geographical locations which made
teleconferencing an effective communication technology for the group. Through
the use of other collaborative technologies (hypermedia data base, system,
process, and product data bases) the collaboration efforts facilitated,
augmented and in some instances helped redefine interaction among members of
the workgroup. Another advantage of
collaborative technologies is how Web-based technology provides virtual access
to knowledge expert and on-line support. In our case, it provided us access to
our lab scientists, system engineers and senior management when needed.
·
Find a current research study that has
been conducted in the last 5 years that supports collaboration as an effective
tool for learning. Include the link and reference for this study in your blog.
Keywords: collaboration, collaborative technology
References:
Driscoll,
M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for
instruction, (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA:
Pearson.
Rheingold, H. (2008, February). Howard Rheingold on collaboration [Video file].
Frost & Sullivan, (2006). Meetings around the world: The impact
of collaboration on business performance. A Frost & Sullivan White Paper Sponsored
by Verizon Business and Microsoft. http://newscenter.verizon.com/kit/collaboration/MAW_WP.pdf.
Hi Sarah,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. Learning networks allow up to access information at a very rapid rate. People also make decisions, “through the lens of a shifting reality” (Siemens, 2006, p. 31). I find interesting that decisions I make one day may change. This may be due to new information that may change. Social networking allows us to exchange ideas. Digital social networking allows us to gain different perspectives.
I did enjoy viewing your mindmap and then reading your caption on social networking. Social networking does feed the institution and ends with learning for the individual.
Vaughn
Reference:
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.Lulu.com.